🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win while missing the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were large groups of votes that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible in which yesterday turned out somewhat badly for him, in which Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner gained 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get additional support from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Additionally he boosted his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president previously backed the progressive this year. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the election was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought we might go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. Thus there was some opposition. However no, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – because they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.