🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.