🔗 Share this article

Former President Donald Trump has consistently expressed his wish to see opponents probed, exerting pressure on the DOJ to charge former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We can't delay any longer, it's killing our standing and trustworthiness," the leader stated recently in a social media post.

"They impeached twice, and indicted me (five times!)" he said, mentioning the four criminal cases he faced after departing the White House in 2021 and James's civil case.

Each have subsequently been indicted, in situations that numerous experts have stated seem to be driven by politics and difficult to succeed in court.

But the latest allegations against a Trump critic, former national security adviser John Bolton, stand apart, legal specialists and former prosecutors assert.

"In my opinion, comparing Bolton's charges to James' is like comparing apples to oranges," stated Mark Lesko, a former federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of New York.

The Specifics of the Case

Bolton has been formally charged on federal charges pertaining to the supposed mishandling of classified information. Since leaving the White House in 2019, he has emerged as a vocal Trump critic, going so far as to call him "remarkably ignorant" and unsuitable for the presidency in his memoir.

Experts contend that while there may be political reasons to go after Bolton, the methods used to obtain an charge and the evidence gathered against him indicate a potentially more substantial legal argument than the Justice Department brought against Comey.

"These actions that's being alleged is both more serious and seems to have taken place over a significant period of time," said Carissa Byrne Hessick, a academic at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

Throughout his time as Trump's security advisor, and after his 2019 White House departure, authorities claimed that Bolton put the country at risk by improperly retaining and transmitting sensitive documents to relatives using unprotected methods, including AOL. Several of the documents were labeled top secret.

The indictment states that at a certain time a unauthorized user accessed to Bolton's system where files were kept and transmitted an apparent warning to cause "the largest controversy since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were released".

Bolton entered a not guilty plea during a hearing on recently to 18 separate counts of improperly handling sensitive materials.

Retribution or a Substantial Case?

The schedule of his charge - arriving on the tails of allegations against Comey - has renewed questions about political pressure on the justice system.

Trump once suggested Bolton should be in prison, and described him a "disreputable person". Bolton, for his part, authored a book about his experience in the Trump government that was highly critical of the president.

"There's no question that the timing of this charge, when paired with additional cases, has raised questions about the strength of these allegations, and why these counts are being filed now," stated Jamil Jaffer, creator and executive director of the National Security Institute.

However, he added, "if the Justice Department is capable to demonstrate the facts alleged and show the material is correctly designated, his behavior may certainly have violated the statute".

Charging such a high-ranking figure for mishandling classified documents is "uncommon" but not unprecedented, said Carrie Cordero, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security.

"Situations that involve classified information pose challenges to try, but they can and are brought against equally junior and high-level officials, from time to time," she said.

Similarities to Investigations into Former President and Biden

Trump likewise faced allegations of improperly storing sensitive materials at his Mar-a-Lago property in Florida and hindering their recovery, but that case was ultimately thrown out by a federal judge and negated by his return as leader.

A special counsel additionally determined that former President Joe Biden wrongfully maintained sensitive materials from his time as second-in-command, but did not criminally charge him.

Bolton's situation shares characteristics to Biden's classified documents issues, noted Mr Lesko, who also held a top national security role at the DOJ.

Rigorous protocols govern the management of classified documents. To secure a conviction, the prosecution must demonstrate that Bolton knew the material he was transmitting was classified, and he had to intentionally transfer it to someone without authorization to obtain it.

"Because of the classified character of the information at question in this matter, we lack a lot of details about the reasons the government believes elements like the personal notes and the additional information he communicated by electronic message, and the reason there were classified," said Mr Jaffer.

A Increasingly Traditional Prosecution

The process by which the Justice Department initiated this case will be closely examined, after Trump publicly expressed his desire to see his political opponents charged and some of those indictments came to fruition.

But Mr Lesko indicated in Bolton's situation, prosecutors appear to have adhered to protocol.

"The Bolton prosecution and eventually the indictment seemed to have observed the regular procedure including the rules and norms within the Department of Justice," he stated.

In contrast to Comey's brief, two-page charge, Bolton's was a increasingly "conventional" filing that "clearly outlines the particulars concerning the facts and circumstances here," Mr Lesko said.

"It seems fairly aligned with a series of precedents... where government officials mishandled and transmitted classified material."